Observed toxicity endpoints measured in prey species relevant to aquaculture food-web interactions.
| Predator (Aquaculture species) | Prey Species | Toxicity Type | Endpoint | Concentration in Prey (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oncorhynchus aguabonita | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Monopterus albus | Poecilia reticulata | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Monopterus albus | Poecilia reticulata | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Poecilia reticulata | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Poecilia reticulata | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Pimephales promelas | Chronic | NOEC | 9.1 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Lepomis macrochirus | Chronic | NOEL | 64.024 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Lepomis macrochirus | Acute | LC50 | 82.57 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Oncorhynchus aguabonita | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Chlorella vulgaris | Acute | EC50 | 82.854 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Ameiurus melas | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Ameiurus melas | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Oncorhynchus tshawytscha | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Salmo trutta | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Salmo trutta | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Salmo trutta | Lepomis macrochirus | Chronic | NOEL | 64.024 |
| Salmo trutta | Lepomis macrochirus | Acute | LC50 | 82.57 |
| Salmo trutta | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Salmo trutta | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Salmo salar | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Salmo salar | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Salmo salar | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Rhamdia quelen | Poecilia reticulata | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Rhamdia quelen | Poecilia reticulata | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Oncorhynchus tshawytscha | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Lithobates catesbeianus | Lithobates pipiens | Chronic | NOEC | 1.600e-4 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss | Pimephales promelas | Chronic | NOEC | 9.1 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Salmo salar | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Lepomis macrochirus | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Micropterus salmoides | Chlorella vulgaris | Chronic | NOEC | 20 |
| Lates calcarifer | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Cyprinus carpio | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Cyprinus carpio | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella | Vicia faba | Chronic | NOEL | 126.491 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella | Vicia faba | Chronic | LOEL | 4 |
| Channa striata | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Channa striata | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Carassius carassius | Daphnia magna | Chronic | NOEL | 10.855 |
| Danio rerio | Daphnia magna | Acute | EC50 | 33.376 |
| Lepomis macrochirus | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Carassius carassius | Daphnia magna | Acute | EC50 | 33.376 |
| Anguilla anguilla | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Anguilla anguilla | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Anguilla anguilla | Fungi | Chronic | NOEL | 300 |
| Anguilla anguilla | Fungi | Chronic | LOEL | 300 |
| Anguilla anguilla | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Anguilla anguilla | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Carassius carassius | Daphnia magna | Acute | LC50 | 259.487 |
| Danio rerio | Daphnia magna | Acute | LC50 | 259.487 |
| Carassius carassius | Daphnia magna | Chronic | NOEC | 2.221 |
| Danio rerio | Daphnia magna | Chronic | NOEL | 10.855 |
| Danio rerio | Daphnia magna | Chronic | NOEC | 2.221 |
| Lates calcarifer | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Pimephales promelas | Chronic | NOEC | 9.1 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Chronic | NOEL | 29.748 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Lepomis macrochirus | Chronic | NOEL | 64.024 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Lepomis macrochirus | Acute | LC50 | 82.57 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Cyprinus carpio | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Acute | LC50 | 68.094 |
| Daphnia magna | Scenedesmus quadricauda | Chronic | NOEC | 2 |
| Daphnia magna | Scenedesmus quadricauda | Acute | EC50 | 162.531 |
| Daphnia magna | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Chronic | NOEL | 100 |
| Daphnia magna | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Chronic | NOEC | 0.4 |
| Daphnia magna | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Acute | EC50 | 29.578 |
| Daphnia magna | Chlorella vulgaris | Chronic | NOEC | 20 |
| Ictalurus punctatus | Cyprinus carpio | Acute | LC50 | 100 |
| Daphnia magna | Chlorella vulgaris | Acute | EC50 | 82.854 |
Observed bioconcentration factors (BCF) measured in prey species relevant for aquaculture food-web interactions.
Select an aquaculture-relevant species to explore trophic interactions associated with this chemical. The network contains two types of edges: (i) edges connecting the chemical to prey species, which are annotated with toxicity endpoints or bioconcentration factor (BCF) values depending on the selected filter, and (ii) trophic edges connecting prey to predator species, where the predator represents the aquaculture species. When neither toxicity nor BCF is selected, only the food-web (prey–predator) network is displayed. Hover over nodes and edges to view additional details.
ReCAnt is a database of chemicals used in aquaculture and their ecotoxic effects, compiled from published literature. The authors are not liable for any inaccuracies or omissions of any chemicals in this resource. Importantly, our sole goal to build this resource on chemicals used in aquaculture is to enable future basic research on this topic, and it does not necessarily reflect the views or objectives of our employers or funders.