Haemaphysalis paraturturis

Unique identifier: 34
Haemaphysalis paraturturis

Morphological Keys

Stage/Sex Morphological Keys
Female
  • Overall body length is ~2.4 mm with legs structurally similar to the male
  • The scutum has sub-equal width and length, widely convex lateral margins, a broadly rounded posterior, slightly larger but less numerous punctations than the male (especially sparse posteriorly), and deep, narrow, parallel cervical grooves extending to mid-length
  • The capitulum features a shorter and wider basis capituli than the male with widely spaced sub-circular porose areas, a hypostome similar to the male's, and palpi with a slightly more pronounced basolateral salience, a small rounded apical nubbin, 7–9 infrainternal setae on segment II, and a wider dorsobasal spur on segment III.
  • Trapido, H., M. G. R. Varma, P. K. Rajagopalan, K. R. P. Singh, and M. J. Rebello. “A Guide to the Identification of All Stages of the Haemaphysalis Ticks of South India.” Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, no. 2 (1964): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300049439.
  • Geevarghese, G., and A. C. Mishra. “Introduction.” In Haemaphysalis Ticks of India. Elsevier, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387811-3.00001-2.
Larva
  • Total body length is ~0.6 mm with moderate coxal spurs (moderately large on coxa I
  • Small on II and III)
  • The scutum is 1.7 times as wide as long with no or very rare punctations
  • The 0.3 mm long capitulum has loosely arranged palpi, a single infrainternal seta, moderate to minimal salience on segment II, a small spur on segment III reaching the upper margin of segment II, and a hypostome with a 2/2 dental formula of 6 denticles per file.
  • Trapido, H., M. G. R. Varma, P. K. Rajagopalan, K. R. P. Singh, and M. J. Rebello. “A Guide to the Identification of All Stages of the Haemaphysalis Ticks of South India.” Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, no. 2 (1964): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300049439.
  • Geevarghese, G., and A. C. Mishra. “Introduction.” In Haemaphysalis Ticks of India. Elsevier, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387811-3.00001-2.
Male
  • Mean body length is ~1.9 mm and width 0.9 mm, featuring moderately long, robust legs with well-defined coxal spurs (large, elongate, and pointed on coxa I
  • Short and widely triangular on II and III
  • Shorter and narrowly triangular on IV)
  • The scutum (widest at coxa IV and slightly over half as wide as long) has 11 clearly defined festoons, moderately numerous and irregular punctations, deep, short, converging cervical grooves, and deep lateral grooves reaching coxa III to enclose one pair of festoons
  • The capitulum features a basis capitulum almost twice as wide as long with shallow punctations and triangular cornua, palpi with an obsolete basolateral salience, and a hypostome extending to the palpal apex with a 4/4 dental formula of ~7 denticles per file.
  • Trapido, H., M. G. R. Varma, P. K. Rajagopalan, K. R. P. Singh, and M. J. Rebello. “A Guide to the Identification of All Stages of the Haemaphysalis Ticks of South India.” Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, no. 2 (1964): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300049439.
  • Geevarghese, G., and A. C. Mishra. “Introduction.” In Haemaphysalis Ticks of India. Elsevier, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387811-3.00001-2.
Nymph
  • Total body length is ~1.1 mm with moderately long, pointed coxal spurs
  • The scutum is 1.4 times as wide as long with rare to absent punctations, well-marked deep festoons, and moderately deep cervical grooves reaching mid-length
  • The 0.2 mm long capitulum features compactly arranged palpi lacking a dorsobasal spur on segment III, a good salience and 3 infrainternal setae on segment II, an elongately triangular pointed spur on segment III reaching mid-length of segment II, and a hypostome with a 2/2 dental formula and 6–7 denticles per file.
  • Trapido, H., M. G. R. Varma, P. K. Rajagopalan, K. R. P. Singh, and M. J. Rebello. “A Guide to the Identification of All Stages of the Haemaphysalis Ticks of South India.” Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, no. 2 (1964): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300049439.
  • Geevarghese, G., and A. C. Mishra. “Introduction.” In Haemaphysalis Ticks of India. Elsevier, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387811-3.00001-2.
DISCLAIMER

TickMapKB is a database of tick species, their distribution, and associated data, compiled from published literature and publicly available sources. The authors are not liable for any inaccuracies or omissions in this resource. This database is intended to support research on tick ecology and distribution and does not necessarily reflect the views or objectives of the authors’ affiliated institutions or funders.